did i? i guess i was trying to point out that the government technically OWNS the big 3 (well not Ford, since they got lucky with loans before the credit markets collapsed). therefore, they can tell them to do whatever they want, and if chrysler or whoever doesn't like it they can go suck an egg.Archangel wrote:You miss the whole point of the thread.......it's about how the government bitches about how much they spend on advertising then go about passing a Bill to spend $20 mil to immigrate Palestinians into the US. It's a where's your priorities issues. And have you priced advertising lately? It also wasn't about business model either.hwsb wrote:crazy responses, eh archangel? you were doing so well too.
since you don't want to refute my arguments period, much less in a logical fashion, just do one thing: say to me (with a straight face) that you think the big three will turn a profit without a major change in their business model. or wait, even better: that the big three will turn a profit simply with more advertising. LOL!
frankly, the upper management that haven't been sacked should be kissing obama's ass to keep their jobs, since in a capitalistic environment they'd have been hung out to dry long ago.