Question on a Forum Rule.

General discussion.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

User avatar
Archangel
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Asskicker in Heaven
Contact:

Post by Archangel » Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:07 pm

Paintball wrote:
ZombieSlayer wrote:Yes but the rule says no pictures

[04] No signature abuse! This option is a luxury and abusing it will result in loss of that luxury. Please refrain from using images in your signature or having signatures that are more than 512x512 worth of lines total.
Hmm I should have clarified. What that last line is saying is dont use images or text in your sig that takes up more than 512x512. Well I edited the rule now so it should make more sense. But uh, those of you that had images in your signature even though the forums rules apparently said not to..tisk tisk...

btw, heres the fixed rule now.

[04] No signature abuse! This option is a luxury and abusing it will result in loss of that luxury. Please refrain from using images in your signature and having text signatures that are more than 512x512 worth of pixels/lines total.
OOOOOkaaaaay.........So your saying that my sig is NOW illegal???
Image

User avatar
Nard
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 559
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Akron, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Nard » Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:50 pm

Yeah i was confused on that as well, you were talking about no images, half the signatures on this forum have images. And are you sure there would be all that lagging? What if the signature were a certain size?
Image
Image
Signature by [IX]AnnaBeaver

User avatar
Archangel
Master Sergeant
Master Sergeant
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:04 pm
Location: Asskicker in Heaven
Contact:

Post by Archangel » Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:14 pm

Nard wrote:Yeah i was confused on that as well, you were talking about no images, half the signatures on this forum have images. And are you sure there would be all that lagging? What if the signature were a certain size?
Most forums do have a max spec size for sigs.....

About the size of mine.
Image

User avatar
ZombieSlayer
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
Posts: 2077
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:41 pm

Post by ZombieSlayer » Fri Dec 07, 2007 12:48 am

Yea it's still confusing I guess.

What it means is that you can't have anything bigger than 512x512 for a siggy.
If you lost your cd and have the old drive and have not reinstalled UT2004 or reformatted the drive, you can find your old cd key in the registry here ...

My Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Unreal Technologies\Installed Apps\UT2004

User avatar
Amy Infless
UT2004 Server Admin
UT2004 Server Admin
Posts: 1285
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:35 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Amy Infless » Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:31 am

Paintball wrote:...having text signatures that are more than 512x512 worth of pixels/lines total.
well i guess my translation svcks here, "text signatures....512x512...lines"
you know how many text i can write in 512x512 lines?

thats more than an ubersig....

ats
Do not try kill THIS bug !!! ->Image Your monitor may not like it...

Those who correct my English will be shot! Survivors will be shot again!

Quester115
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:10 pm
Location: at the Uni
Contact:

Post by Quester115 » Fri Dec 07, 2007 5:51 pm

512x512 lines...lines of pixels...512x512pixels ... 262144 pixels...keep your sig under that, are we done here yet :roll:
edit: yeah that came off a bit rude, much apologies to the peoples of teh interwebs
edit: no-offense to anyone in particular, just getting to be a circle topic that was answered a looong time back
Image
[seeking truth in life, no matter how painful it can be]

Post Reply

Return to “UT2004 General Discussion”