Page 1 of 2
physX card
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:45 am
by 1800
been doing research on these. from what i can tell, the card pretty much just helps carry the load from your CPU and GPU. my question is this. if all it does is help the overall load from your processors, wouldnt it just be easier to buy a better video card with more RAM? other than that what purpose does it serve? if i run SLI...two cards at 768, would a physX card even be worth installing? if i run one card at that rate would it be worth buying??? input from people who know more about this than me would be helpful...TY
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 am
by Ortega
I dont think the card works if you go SLI. I think it takes a VGA slot. Not sure did the reading on it about 4 months ago. Its been talking about though before.
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:50 am
by 1800
right now the card is sold as pci..but they have plans to make it pci-e
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:02 am
by Quester115
wait a few months before investing in one of these as programers learn to tap multicore processors (nehalem supports up to 8

) this may all be a passing idea, or they might become more powerful and be developed for pci-e and with the next nVidia chipset rumored to have 3 full speed pci-e a 6-8 months wait may be very well worth it
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:06 pm
by 1800
its not that expensive now, the question was more based on if the card actually DOES anything more than just assist the GPU and CPU. buying a graphics card with more ram does that anyway. $150.00 is not expensive. $550.00 is. im wondering more along the lines of if the damn thing does anything extra any more than just assisting. if it doesnt, then i dont see why i shouldnt run two video cards at 768. it may be more expensive, but in theory i will get better results with those two cards instead of one 768 and one physx card.
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:02 pm
by Jet$
has anyone seen any games that take any advantage of the physx card.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:22 am
by NIR_Rimc
Jet$ wrote:has anyone seen any games that take any advantage of the physx card.
UT3 with a PhysX card, scroll down for the video. (SNEAK PEEK)
http://www.ageia.com/physx/ut3.html
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 4:50 am
by Archangel
If your going to run a physics card, you still need a top vid card too in order to run the game at extreme high detail. So, save up that $650+ so you can turn up the eyecandy.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:05 am
by hwsb
plus, wasn't there some speculation as to the second sli connector on the 8800gtx's possibility of bridging to some sort of physics solution, either from nvidia or a third party? haven't heard much of that lately...
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:20 pm
by Ortega
That is what I was thinking. The SLi issue. Not sure if that was a rumor of just a misread on my art. I think they cost like $100 or so. but you Arch is right you graphics card has to up to par. I know it helps the CPU and Graphics card out.
UT3 is the one of the big games it works with that is coming out. There is another game also. Can't remember. This was talked about and at that time it wasn't worth it. I think Questar asked about it. I still think you should wait though. M.O.