Is a dedicated physics card worth the money

General discussion.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Quester115
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:10 pm
Location: at the Uni
Contact:

Is a dedicated physics card worth the money

Post by Quester115 » Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:44 am

I've been upgrading my pc slowly as the months go by and Ageia's physX processor caught my eye. I was wondering i anyone knows if a card like this will be worth it in the upcoming years. UE3 has the potential to use it, and so does the ps3 and 360, but having a hard time finding real info on the card.
Image
[seeking truth in life, no matter how painful it can be]

User avatar
virussick
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:58 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Post by virussick » Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:25 pm

Physics card, really I wouldnt buy one because I already have a powerfull card and secondly, sure it can boost your performance slightly but not much, but I would recommend and just wait for the UT3 spec to come out and then find out if its worth it or not.

Ortega
First Sergeant
First Sergeant
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:33 am
Location: Camp Verde, AZ

Post by Ortega » Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:07 pm

I do believe UT3 is going to be able to run it. It works like it should if the game supports it. That is the problem. I'm not sure how much UT3 will work with it but. Its something that I wouldn't get now. Its like Vista. No support but works great when you get the program that runs it. They also need to get a Pci-E version to help the Graphics cards speed. But the quad core might put it into extention of old gaming real quick, not sure yet though. I'm thinking about it and if I do I will let you know.
Later all!

User avatar
BaronVonRotterdam
UT2004 Server Admin
UT2004 Server Admin
Posts: 2603
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: The Terrible State (New York)
Contact:

Re: Is a dedicated physics card worth the money

Post by BaronVonRotterdam » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:47 am

Quester115 wrote:I've been upgrading my pc slowly as the months go by and Ageia's physX processor caught my eye. I was wondering i anyone knows if a card like this will be worth it in the upcoming years. UE3 has the potential to use it, and so does the ps3 and 360, but having a hard time finding real info on the card.
maybe the particle gun can use this card hahahahahahhahahaha.
| ASRock Fatal1ty X470 | AMD Ryzen 3700x @Stock | 32GB DDR4 3200 mHz | Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Super | Dell S2417DG |

31337h4ck3r
Private
Private
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:50 pm

Post by 31337h4ck3r » Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:32 am

I just saw this article on AnandTech: Where's The Physics: The State of Hardware Accelerated Physics - http://tinyurl.com/3xt3z5

Also I found this thread at [H]ard|Forum: Unreal Tourney 3 (2007) Physx - http://tinyurl.com/36sywk

Overall I dont think Physx is worth it, but maybe that will chnage later. Time will tell.

User avatar
BoneofMalkav
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:08 pm
Location: In the Land of Rape and Honey
Contact:

Post by BoneofMalkav » Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:26 am

it'll change later on,it's still in it's teething stages atm so of course it won't be bug free.I'm just getting one this year cause already and for most of the games I see coming out are requiring a physx card (Bioshock,I'm sure UT3 will need it,I know Mass Effect will,ect.)
Like Helter Skelter,And son of Sam.
By the days end you'll know who I am.I spill your blood on the Hollywood Boulevard.I won't rest until your headless.

Dog Fashion Disco-Headless

Quester115
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:10 pm
Location: at the Uni
Contact:

Post by Quester115 » Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:26 pm

well thanks all for your input,think i'm going with this...
play ut3 w/o card
get it
if it does make a difference i won't return it ;)

i'm thinking that multi core processing may make this card obsolete(thinking of nVidia's tesla card, man that things a behemoth if your company can develop for it) , but maybe not since aegia and others will be looking at the same tech to add even more to their chips
Image
[seeking truth in life, no matter how painful it can be]

Big_Meat
Private
Private
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:26 am
Location: Up in your crib, eatin' your food.

Post by Big_Meat » Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:17 pm

I wouldn't buy one. It just seems like another attempt to squeeze yet more cash out of the lucrative gaming industry. Most multi-core gaming rigs have more than enough power to handle the tasks that a physics processor is meant to take over. It's a waste of money, not to mention the extra drain on your power supply and a waste of a perfectly good expansion slot.

User avatar
hwsb
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 413
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 11:05 am
Contact:

Post by hwsb » Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:30 am

Quester115 wrote:well thanks all for your input,think i'm going with this...
play ut3 w/o card
get it
if it does make a difference i won't return it ;)

i'm thinking that multi core processing may make this card obsolete(thinking of nVidia's tesla card, man that things a behemoth if your company can develop for it) , but maybe not since aegia and others will be looking at the same tech to add even more to their chips
this is what most people have come to say, especially on places like techpowerup.com etc... way too expensive for what it does, multi-core cpus can do the same, and when dedicated gpu-physics sli setups become popular the aegia will be an expensive paperweight.


though it will be interesting what effect it has on UT3, you'll have to post some screenies when the time finally rolls around. :drinkers:

Ortega
First Sergeant
First Sergeant
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:33 am
Location: Camp Verde, AZ

Post by Ortega » Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:22 pm

yeah I agree with umm ^^..

But By the time UT3 comes out they could be a octo-core and beyong SLI. (Just sarcasim, dont take this serioues!)
Later all!

Post Reply

Return to “UT2004 General Discussion”